Season 4? Or is it over after this?

[Jasper]

Hmmmm.....

OK, that's a little odd. It could just be something like "Audrey lives on . . . in our hearts". I wouldn't normally give much weight to a tweet like this, though with the recent cryptic comments from Lynch and Sutherland it might merit a little bit of extra consideration. I guess we'll see if any other cast members say/tweet anything unusual.

What’s the status of the convention? I see that it’s scheduled for 10/30. Are they planning to hold it in person or virtually or what?

It was set for early April, then moved to three days with Halloween in the middle. The most recent Graceland event was virtual. I don't see anything on the calendar from now until Twin Peaks, which is still being advertised as in-person.

[baxter]

From reddit user thomasjthomasj:

I wouldn't hold too much stock in the Audrey tweet. It looks like it was in direct response to a question she asked about what you would call a Twin Peaks sequel

https://twitter.com/sherilynfenn1/statu ... 6731160576
https://twitter.com/sherilynfenn1/statu ... 3990675457
https://twitter.com/sherilynfenn1/statu ... 7266824198

She hasn't threaded them but they're all clearly related and implies she's working on an Audrey book rather than a new series

[Mr. Reindeer]

From reddit user thomasjthomasj:

I wouldn't hold too much stock in the Audrey tweet. It looks like it was in direct response to a question she asked about what you would call a Twin Peaks sequel

https://twitter.com/sherilynfenn1/statu ... 6731160576
https://twitter.com/sherilynfenn1/statu ... 3990675457
https://twitter.com/sherilynfenn1/statu ... 7266824198

She hasn't threaded them but they're all clearly related and implies she's working on an Audrey book rather than a new series

That checks out. I love Sherilyn, but would never recommend putting much stock in anything she tweets.

Really curious what if anything is announced at this TP convention, if and when it happens, in whatever format it ends up being. I personally am not expecting any announcement of new episodes or filmed content. But I wonder if there will be anything at all announced that slightly vindicates HHM’s constantly insistent doubling-down.

[baxter]

Yeah I trust HHM for some reason, and it's not just wishful thinking. I think they may have exaggerated something, but I don't think they would entirely make it up. Time will tell I guess.

[bob_wooler]

Jim Belushi is screaming "cherry pie" on Twitter. Cherry pie with the sweet taste of Mary Jane, or something else?
https://twitter.com/JimBelushi/status/1296273774942326784

[Eater of Iguanas]

Jim Belushi is screaming "cherry pie" on Twitter. Cherry pie with the sweet taste of Mary Jane, or something else?
https://twitter.com/JimBelushi/status/1296273774942326784

If those two characters are returning, I'd rather go without, thank you very much.

[Rudagger]

Jim Belushi is screaming "cherry pie" on Twitter. Cherry pie with the sweet taste of Mary Jane, or something else?
https://twitter.com/JimBelushi/status/1296273774942326784

If those two characters are returning, I'd rather go without, thank you very much.

The Mitchum's were a highlight of the Return for me, and I'd love to see more of 'em.

"What the fuck kind of neighbourhood is this!?"

".. people are under a lot of stress Bradley"

[baxter]

Yeah I was expecting to hate them, but ended up loving them. Each to their own though.

[JohnGSmoke]

Jim Belushi is screaming "cherry pie" on Twitter. Cherry pie with the sweet taste of Mary Jane, or something else?
https://twitter.com/JimBelushi/status/1296273774942326784

If those two characters are returning, I'd rather go without, thank you very much.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AXX°N N.]

It's striking how the perspective changes with the setting. Not a single person I've watched season 3 with has had any reaction but love for those characters.

[Eater of Iguanas]

It's striking how the perspective changes with the setting. Not a single person I've watched season 3 with has had any reaction but love for those characters.

Yeah, I'm in the minority camp of "bitterly disappointed with Season 3." Those characters epitomized the boring, masturbatory nature of much of the season, and its bent for dumb, unfunny comedy. Even a grade-B Original Twin Peaks character like Hank Jennings was more entertaining.

I'm continually mystified by the positive reaction to Nu-Twin Peaks. But I'm happy for those of you who enjoyed it!

[AXX°N N.]

It's striking how the perspective changes with the setting. Not a single person I've watched season 3 with has had any reaction but love for those characters.

Yeah, I'm in the minority camp of "bitterly disappointed with Season 3." Those characters epitomized the boring, masturbatory nature of much of the season, and its bent for dumb, unfunny comedy. Even a grade-B Original Twin Peaks character like Hank Jennings was more entertaining.

I'm continually mystified by the positive reaction to Nu-Twin Peaks. But I'm happy for those of you who enjoyed it!

That's a good attitude to have! For me, I don't see any difference between the broad humor surrounding the Mitchums and old schtick involving, say, Andy, especially the scene where he hits his head on a plank and dazedly shimmies around for a minute.

[Mr. Reindeer]

It's striking how the perspective changes with the setting. Not a single person I've watched season 3 with has had any reaction but love for those characters.

Yeah, I'm in the minority camp of "bitterly disappointed with Season 3." Those characters epitomized the boring, masturbatory nature of much of the season, and its bent for dumb, unfunny comedy. Even a grade-B Original Twin Peaks character like Hank Jennings was more entertaining.

I'm continually mystified by the positive reaction to Nu-Twin Peaks. But I'm happy for those of you who enjoyed it!

That's a good attitude to have! For me, I don't see any difference between the broad humor surrounding the Mitchums and old schtick involving, say, Andy, especially the scene where he hits his head on a plank and dazedly shimmies around for a minute.

I personally find the Mitchums funnier than most of the S2 Andy stuff (I love the slow-burn exasperation of the scene where they watch Candie talking to Anthony on the casino floor). But humor is certainly subjective. I’ve never really been a fan of L/F broad humor in the past (I’m not an On the Air fan), but the instances of it on TR felt less forced and better executed than in the past for me.

[AXX°N N.]

Yeah, I'm in the minority camp of "bitterly disappointed with Season 3." Those characters epitomized the boring, masturbatory nature of much of the season, and its bent for dumb, unfunny comedy. Even a grade-B Original Twin Peaks character like Hank Jennings was more entertaining.

I'm continually mystified by the positive reaction to Nu-Twin Peaks. But I'm happy for those of you who enjoyed it!

That's a good attitude to have! For me, I don't see any difference between the broad humor surrounding the Mitchums and old schtick involving, say, Andy, especially the scene where he hits his head on a plank and dazedly shimmies around for a minute.

I personally find the Mitchums funnier than most of the S2 Andy stuff (I love the slow-burn exasperation of the scene where they watch Candie talking to Anthony on the casino floor). But humor is certainly subjective. I’ve never really been a fan of L/F broad humor in the past (I’m not an On the Air fan), but the instances of it on TR felt less forced and better executed than in the past for me.

I'm in the same boat. In fact it's dawned on me over time that a lot of the humor in S3, to me, feels very in line with what On the Air should have been, re the execution of that style of humor. In S3 I find the extremely casual performative aspect of it (where puns fly under the radar to the point of invisibility and characters underreact to what is clearly absurd and almost anachronistic in the sense of a televisual comedy gag) to be kind of fascinating in tone.

[Mr. Reindeer]

I'm in the same boat. In fact it's dawned on me over time that a lot of the humor in S3, to me, feels very in line with what On the Air should have been, re the execution of that style of humor. In S3 I find the extremely casual performative aspect of it (where puns fly under the radar to the point of invisibility and characters underreact to what is clearly absurd and almost anachronistic in the sense of a televisual comedy gag) to be kind of fascinating in tone.

That’s interesting, and I agree. Instead of playing up the zaniness and comedy, the deadpan reactions of Hawk and Albert and Frank (with looooong pauses) almost let the audience in on how cheesy certain gags are, like the joke becomes the unfunniness of the joke. If that makes sense.