NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

General discussion on Twin Peaks not related to the series, film, books, music, photos, or collectors merchandise.

Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne

User avatar
eyeboogers
Great Northern Member
Posts: 729
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 3:35 am
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by eyeboogers »

N. Needleman wrote:I think the show is very divisive for audiences, period. I think critically it has been surprisingly less so, in part because I think a lot of critics are just stunned speechless and staying open - which is not what I'd expected.

There's non-fan forums I've gone where people either unreservedly love it or absolutely despise it, or there's a mix. I don't think Dugpa is necessarily that different. I also think the balance will depend on where the story goes and how long it takes. I don't think we can put a percentage on it. I am surprised by how much active buzz it has, on par with other big shows.

That being said: If its streaming numbers remain solid and the critical praise continues, and Showtime is still hooked on its critical cachet, I think there's a good shot at another season if Lynch and Frost want to do one. Which is fine by me. I don't really care whether it is servicing the fans so much as servicing itself, and as long as it's doing that well I think it should be allowed another series if it wants one. I don't think it should be chastened.
Needleman do you have a link to any recent streaming numbers, I only remember seeing the ones following the premiere?
User avatar
laughingpinecone
Great Northern Member
Posts: 725
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:45 am
Location: D'ni
Contact:

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by laughingpinecone »

Firsthand info from the Tumblr side of things: Showtime is heavily advertising the show on that platform in the States and there is, of course, an uptick in the volume of discussion and giffing (fanart not so much, regrettably. Only two Diane pics so far? Inconceivable!). There's also a low but constant stream of people getting into the old show with the stated intent of catching up. Still, the show has failed to make it to the trending tags past the premiere.
] The gathered are known by their faces of stone.
User avatar
mtwentz
Lodge Member
Posts: 2185
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:02 am

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by mtwentz »

eyeboogers wrote:
N. Needleman wrote:I think the show is very divisive for audiences, period. I think critically it has been surprisingly less so, in part because I think a lot of critics are just stunned speechless and staying open - which is not what I'd expected.

There's non-fan forums I've gone where people either unreservedly love it or absolutely despise it, or there's a mix. I don't think Dugpa is necessarily that different. I also think the balance will depend on where the story goes and how long it takes. I don't think we can put a percentage on it. I am surprised by how much active buzz it has, on par with other big shows.

That being said: If its streaming numbers remain solid and the critical praise continues, and Showtime is still hooked on its critical cachet, I think there's a good shot at another season if Lynch and Frost want to do one. Which is fine by me. I don't really care whether it is servicing the fans so much as servicing itself, and as long as it's doing that well I think it should be allowed another series if it wants one. I don't think it should be chastened.
Needleman do you have a link to any recent streaming numbers, I only remember seeing the ones following the premiere?


I doubt anyone will find any- Showtime only released those numbers to counteract the bad publicity from the opening Nielsen ratings. They are under no obligation to release such numbers and I think media companies typically hold those numbers tight to the vest.
F*&^ you Gene Kelly
User avatar
mtwentz
Lodge Member
Posts: 2185
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:02 am

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by mtwentz »

mtsi wrote:Perhaps it's the 50% I'm reading. It's clear it's not seen as wonderful by all. Regardless, I still stand by the remainder of my post. I am a fan. I get fandom, but I cannot believe how precious some are of Twin Peaks. We've had 25+ years to percolate in our own memories and set our own narratives. That's doesn't make it 'so.' Perspective is just that.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
I am not worried about the negative reactions among some of the fans. It was even worse when Fire Walk With Me premiered. I think they'll come around, at least most of them. Fire Walk With Me stood the test of time, and I believe this will be seen as even better than FWWM (at least from what I have seen so far). Would like to hear more Badalament music though :-).
F*&^ you Gene Kelly
User avatar
Jonah
Global Moderator
Posts: 2815
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:39 am

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by Jonah »

mtwentz wrote:
mtsi wrote:Perhaps it's the 50% I'm reading. It's clear it's not seen as wonderful by all. Regardless, I still stand by the remainder of my post. I am a fan. I get fandom, but I cannot believe how precious some are of Twin Peaks. We've had 25+ years to percolate in our own memories and set our own narratives. That's doesn't make it 'so.' Perspective is just that.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
I am not worried about the negative reactions among some of the fans. It was even worse when Fire Walk With Me premiered. I think they'll come around, at least most of them. Fire Walk With Me stood the test of time, and I believe this will be seen as even better than FWWM (at least from what I have seen so far). Would like to hear more Badalament music though :-).
I think they will come around too (myself included). But I still don't think they'll necessarily warm to all of it. It might end up that they (we) will love some parts, hate other parts. I think some of the TP-set stuff that has already been hinted at/spoiled in old threads will go over well with all fans.
I have no idea where this will lead us, but I have a definite feeling it will be a place both wonderful and strange.
User avatar
mtsi
RR Diner Member
Posts: 253
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:56 pm

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by mtsi »

I'd agree with that sentiment.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
We live inside a dream.
User avatar
Ross
Global Moderator
Posts: 2199
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:04 pm
Contact:

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by Ross »

mtsi wrote:I'd agree with that sentiment.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
I still want to know who the actor was that MTSI saw on location that's not on the cast list...
"I can see half my life's history in your face... And I'm not sure that I want to."
http://twinpeakssoundtrackdesign.blogspot.com/
User avatar
mtsi
RR Diner Member
Posts: 253
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:56 pm

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by mtsi »

Shhh

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
We live inside a dream.
User avatar
dud
RR Diner Member
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 1:09 pm
Location: North Jersey

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by dud »

I was thinking about that too! very exciting
User avatar
Panapaok
Bookhouse Member
Posts: 1025
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:07 am

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by Panapaok »

Ross wrote:
mtsi wrote:I'd agree with that sentiment.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
I still want to know who the actor was that MTSI saw on location that's not on the cast list...
Filled with secrets...
This is - excuse me - a damn fine cup of coffee.
User avatar
mtsi
RR Diner Member
Posts: 253
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:56 pm

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by mtsi »

That drawer has yet to be opened.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
We live inside a dream.
User avatar
Mallard
RR Diner Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:47 pm

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by Mallard »

mtsi wrote:That drawer has yet to be opened.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Hmm...
Welcome...to the third...place.
User avatar
secretlettermkr
RR Diner Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:14 am

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by secretlettermkr »

mtwentz wrote:
mtsi wrote:Perhaps it's the 50% I'm reading. It's clear it's not seen as wonderful by all. Regardless, I still stand by the remainder of my post. I am a fan. I get fandom, but I cannot believe how precious some are of Twin Peaks. We've had 25+ years to percolate in our own memories and set our own narratives. That's doesn't make it 'so.' Perspective is just that.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
I am not worried about the negative reactions among some of the fans. It was even worse when Fire Walk With Me premiered. I think they'll come around, at least most of them. Fire Walk With Me stood the test of time, and I believe this will be seen as even better than FWWM (at least from what I have seen so far). Would like to hear more Badalament music though :-).
Spoiler:
there was one new piece in the last episode!
:?: ?
User avatar
Soolsma
Bookhouse Member
Posts: 1426
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:28 pm
Location: Peru

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by Soolsma »

I am beginning to wonder: when Lynch stepped out, was it because he felt he should stretch the script into 18 hours of film and Showtime wanted him to cram it in to 9 hours? Or something likewise.
Carrie Page: "It's a long way... In those days, I was too young to know any better."
Metamorphia
RR Diner Member
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 4:52 am

Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

Post by Metamorphia »

Soolsma wrote:I am beginning to wonder: when Lynch stepped out, was it because he felt he should stretch the script into 18 hours of film and Showtime wanted him to cram it in to 9 hours? Or something likewise.
As far as I'm aware that was exactly what happened.

But there was no script to stretch, it was already written as 18 hours' worth. :p
Post Reply