Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

General discussion on Twin Peaks not related to the series, film, books, music, photos, or collectors merchandise.

Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne

User avatar
tmurry
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 2:53 pm

Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by tmurry »

On the Showtime website, short sentence descriptions have been added (not much spoiling, just pithy little epigrams).

http://www.sho.com/twin-peaks/the-return/part/0
User avatar
Twink Peaks
RR Diner Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 2:01 pm

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by Twink Peaks »

titles. not descriptions :?:
User avatar
polishq
RR Diner Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:53 am

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by polishq »

Twink Peaks wrote:titles. not descriptions
They're descriptions. "Part 1" is the title. See this page as an example: http://www.sho.com/billions/season/2/episode/1
User avatar
Twink Peaks
RR Diner Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 2:01 pm

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by Twink Peaks »

Twin Peaks: The Return Part 1 – My log has a message for you

Twin Peaks: The Return Part 2 – The stars turn and a time presents itself
User avatar
Boy
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:49 am

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by Boy »

Last week: Okay... maybe the show won't be "THAT" good.
Now: the Hype has gone OFF-THE-ROOF again and I'm not sure we are ready for what is coming at us next month!!!
User avatar
tmurry
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 2:53 pm

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by tmurry »

Look at the other Showtime shows - the titles are Part 0 and Part 1, the sentence tags are in the position of episode descriptions.

I just posted this because the small crumbs of poetic description just seem so right for this that I get goosies.
Rami Airola
RR Diner Member
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:31 am

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by Rami Airola »

http://www.sho.com/twin-peaks/the-return/part/3
http://www.sho.com/twin-peaks/the-return/part/4

There are things for parts 3 and 4 as well.


EDIT:
Parts 0 and 2 have the same sentence. I wonder if Part 0 is even supposed to be a thing.
User avatar
polishq
RR Diner Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:53 am

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by polishq »

Rami Airola wrote:http://www.sho.com/twin-peaks/the-return/part/3
http://www.sho.com/twin-peaks/the-return/part/4

There are things for parts 3 and 4 as well.


EDIT:
Parts 0 and 2 have the same sentence. I wonder if Part 0 is even supposed to be a thing.
Weird, I get 404 errors for both of those.

"Part 0" is the two-hour combination of Parts 1 & 2.
dronerstone
RR Diner Member
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:31 pm

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by dronerstone »

Part 3: "Call for help"
Part 4: "Brings back some memories"

About part 3, my mind is going wild about deciding whether "CALL" is a verb or noun here. :D

Edit: Entering pt. "5" gets me a 404.
Rami Airola
RR Diner Member
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:31 am

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by Rami Airola »

polishq wrote:
Rami Airola wrote:http://www.sho.com/twin-peaks/the-return/part/3
http://www.sho.com/twin-peaks/the-return/part/4

There are things for parts 3 and 4 as well.


EDIT:
Parts 0 and 2 have the same sentence. I wonder if Part 0 is even supposed to be a thing.
Weird, I get 404 errors for both of those.
I get that now too.
So, wow, I guess that was something we were not supposed to see yet :O
"Part 0" is the two-hour combination of Parts 1 & 2.
Oh, that makes sense.
Explains why they initially said the first episode would air first and episodes 3 and 4 right after that.
Rami Airola
RR Diner Member
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:31 am

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by Rami Airola »

dronerstone wrote:Part 3: "Call for help"
Part 4: "Brings back some memories"

About part 3, my mind is going wild about deciding whether "CALL" is a verb or noun here. :D

Edit: Entering pt. "5" gets me a 404.
The exact wording of Part 4 was "...Brings back some memories." with the three dots.
Not that it matters but I thought someone might be interested.
User avatar
The Jumping Man
RR Diner Member
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:27 pm

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by The Jumping Man »

So the stars align, the Lodge opens, Cooper escapes, but his memory is gone.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
User avatar
JordinGoff
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:51 am

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by JordinGoff »

I originally misread it as "...BRIGGS back some memories" :)
I would love to see the Log's message being for Bobby though, now that I'm thinking about the Briggs family. Theories about him continuing his father's work in some capacity always intrigued me.
User avatar
saygoodbyetojack
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:18 am
Location: Dublin

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by saygoodbyetojack »

JordinGoff wrote:I originally misread it as "...BRIGGS back some memories" :)
I would love to see the Log's message being for Bobby though, now that I'm thinking about the Briggs family. Theories about him continuing his father's work in some capacity always intrigued me.
I also misread it exactly like that ha ha
User avatar
Saturn's child
RR Diner Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 4:38 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Re: Part 0 and part 1 now have episode descriptions

Post by Saturn's child »

Rami Airola wrote:The exact wording of Part 4 was "...Brings back some memories." with the three dots.
Not that it matters but I thought someone might be interested.
It does matter & I am interested, so thank you for this clarification! :)
Post Reply