NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

General discussion on Twin Peaks not related to the series, film, books, music, photos, or collectors merchandise.

Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne

User avatar
Gabriel
Great Northern Member
Posts: 787
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by Gabriel »

mtwentz wrote:Here is an answer I got from Quora:

'Q: Would a small US town have a sheriff or police?
A: It depends on the size of a town and the available money in a budget as well as the laws of the state whether they will have one or more municipal officers or rely on the county sheriff's department for law enforcement. In an area without sufficient funds to pay a full-time officer, sometimes a small town will hire a part-time person(s) who may also work full-time elsewhere. "

I say the size of the Twin Peaks Sherriff's dept. implies:
1) Twin Peaks is a county as well as a town (like San Francisco, which is a city and a county), since all sherrifs offices in the U.S. are at the county level
2) the population is closer to 50,000, since a town of only 5,000 would not have the budget to pay for such a large force (Sherriff, Andy, Hawk, Lucy, Cappy and the deputy seen in the pilot etc.)
That's really interesting. It would also allow for the possibility that the county has 50,000 inhabitants and the town far fewer, which would fit with the smaller town feel throughout the show.
User avatar
kitty666cats
RR Diner Member
Posts: 131
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 4:38 pm

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by kitty666cats »

Gabriel wrote:
mtwentz wrote:Here is an answer I got from Quora:

'Q: Would a small US town have a sheriff or police?
A: It depends on the size of a town and the available money in a budget as well as the laws of the state whether they will have one or more municipal officers or rely on the county sheriff's department for law enforcement. In an area without sufficient funds to pay a full-time officer, sometimes a small town will hire a part-time person(s) who may also work full-time elsewhere. "

I say the size of the Twin Peaks Sherriff's dept. implies:
1) Twin Peaks is a county as well as a town (like San Francisco, which is a city and a county), since all sherrifs offices in the U.S. are at the county level
2) the population is closer to 50,000, since a town of only 5,000 would not have the budget to pay for such a large force (Sherriff, Andy, Hawk, Lucy, Cappy and the deputy seen in the pilot etc.)
That's really interesting. It would also allow for the possibility that the county has 50,000 inhabitants and the town far fewer, which would fit with the smaller town feel throughout the show.
It would also help with the Fat Trout inconsistencies that TSHOTP created :P
User avatar
garethw
RR Diner Member
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:48 pm
Location: Deep River

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by garethw »

Gabriel wrote: That's really interesting. It would also allow for the possibility that the county has 50,000 inhabitants and the town far fewer, which would fit with the smaller town feel throughout the show.
I seem to be in the minority (possibly of 1), but it never seemed plausible to me that a town of just 5,000 would have Horne's Department Store.

My completely unsubstantiated belief is that the correct population is 15,201.
User avatar
garethw
RR Diner Member
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:48 pm
Location: Deep River

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by garethw »

garethw wrote:
Gabriel wrote: That's really interesting. It would also allow for the possibility that the county has 50,000 inhabitants and the town far fewer, which would fit with the smaller town feel throughout the show.
I seem to be in the minority (possibly of 1), but it never seemed plausible to me that a town of just 5,000 would have Horne's Department Store.

My completely unsubstantiated belief is that the correct population is 15,201.
Oops, + 0.1 for Sam Lanterman au bois.
User avatar
Gabriel
Great Northern Member
Posts: 787
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by Gabriel »

garethw wrote:
Gabriel wrote: That's really interesting. It would also allow for the possibility that the county has 50,000 inhabitants and the town far fewer, which would fit with the smaller town feel throughout the show.
I seem to be in the minority (possibly of 1), but it never seemed plausible to me that a town of just 5,000 would have Horne's Department Store.

My completely unsubstantiated belief is that the correct population is 15,201.
Yeah, it's an odd one resulting, I guess, from the network making them up the size of population. In the final episode of season two, what's more jarring than the bank exploding is that we see what passes for a substantial urban high street exterior in the show for the first time when Pete and Andrew set off Eckhardt's bomb.
baxter
Great Northern Member
Posts: 565
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by baxter »

I grew up in a town of 7,000. Twin Peaks would certainly not have had a department store!
User avatar
garethw
RR Diner Member
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:48 pm
Location: Deep River

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by garethw »

Gabriel wrote:
garethw wrote:
Gabriel wrote: That's really interesting. It would also allow for the possibility that the county has 50,000 inhabitants and the town far fewer, which would fit with the smaller town feel throughout the show.
I seem to be in the minority (possibly of 1), but it never seemed plausible to me that a town of just 5,000 would have Horne's Department Store.

My completely unsubstantiated belief is that the correct population is 15,201.
Yeah, it's an odd one resulting, I guess, from the network making them up the size of population. In the final episode of season two, what's more jarring than the bank exploding is that we see what passes for a substantial urban high street exterior in the show for the first time when Pete and Andrew set off Eckhardt's bomb.
No, my point was actually the opposite - that the network's mandated population of 50,000 actually is more plausible when you look around the town than what Lynch/Frost wanted. Twin Peaks doesn't actually seem like the small town it's purported to be.

None of it really bothered me; I'm just surprised that fans seem to universally believe the population of this town (with a fancy hotel, fancy houses, a boutique department store, the high street you mention) should really be 5000.
Aerozhul
RR Diner Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:07 am

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by Aerozhul »

garethw wrote:
Gabriel wrote:
garethw wrote: None of it really bothered me; I'm just surprised that fans seem to universally believe the population of this town (with a fancy hotel, fancy houses, a boutique department store, the high street you mention) should really be 5000.
I guess I just always attributed the hotel, department store and what appears to be a "revitalized" Main Street to the fact that there's a lot of money in the town - the Packards and especially the Hornes probably bankrolled a lot of those aspects. Ben Horne being the financier/developer and tycoon that he was, trying to attract foreign investment into the town, made sure that things were nice. Doubtful the Icelanders and their ilk would have been as impressed without those things.
User avatar
mtwentz
Lodge Member
Posts: 2185
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:02 am

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by mtwentz »

Aerozhul wrote:
garethw wrote:
Gabriel wrote:
I guess I just always attributed the hotel, department store and what appears to be a "revitalized" Main Street to the fact that there's a lot of money in the town - the Packards and especially the Hornes probably bankrolled a lot of those aspects. Ben Horne being the financier/developer and tycoon that he was, trying to attract foreign investment into the town, made sure that things were nice. Doubtful the Icelanders and their ilk would have been as impressed without those things.
It doesn't matter how much money is in the town, a population of 5,000 would still not support a full blown department store, unless there were a lot of other surrounding towns to draw customers from I suppose.
F*&^ you Gene Kelly
User avatar
Dead Dog
RR Diner Member
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:25 am

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by Dead Dog »

All of you make good points. I've always reconciled those things by telling myself they have a lot of tourism dollars coming into their local economy (Great Northern sure is a busy place after all).
User avatar
krishnanspace
Bookhouse Member
Posts: 1174
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:15 am

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by krishnanspace »

Was there any tribute to Miguel ferrer or Warren frost during the Oscars?
User avatar
teddyleevin
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 9:53 am
Contact:

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by teddyleevin »

Aerozhul wrote:
garethw wrote:
Gabriel wrote:
I guess I just always attributed the hotel, department store and what appears to be a "revitalized" Main Street to the fact that there's a lot of money in the town - the Packards and especially the Hornes probably bankrolled a lot of those aspects. Ben Horne being the financier/developer and tycoon that he was, trying to attract foreign investment into the town, made sure that things were nice. Doubtful the Icelanders and their ilk would have been as impressed without those things.
The establishing shot used for the dept. store always seems to me like it comes from another universe altogether.
User avatar
Mordeen
Great Northern Member
Posts: 895
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 7:03 am
Location: Near Mr. Gerard's Cabin in Kalispell, MT

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by Mordeen »

krishnanspace wrote:Was there any tribute to Miguel ferrer or Warren frost during the Oscars?
I'd venture a guess "no," considering the awards and tributes were for 2016, but you can bet when Twin Peaks gets the Emmy for Outstanding Drama Series there will be something said for all the TP alumni whom have passed, both recently and further back.

-Mordeen
Moving Through Time. . .
User avatar
bob_wooler
RR Diner Member
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 2:00 am

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by bob_wooler »

mtwentz wrote:
Aerozhul wrote:
garethw wrote:
I guess I just always attributed the hotel, department store and what appears to be a "revitalized" Main Street to the fact that there's a lot of money in the town - the Packards and especially the Hornes probably bankrolled a lot of those aspects. Ben Horne being the financier/developer and tycoon that he was, trying to attract foreign investment into the town, made sure that things were nice. Doubtful the Icelanders and their ilk would have been as impressed without those things.
It doesn't matter how much money is in the town, a population of 5,000 would still not support a full blown department store, unless there were a lot of other surrounding towns to draw customers from I suppose.
I don't know, but to me the Great Northern always seemed like a conference hotel. Back in '89, if so, I would guess 90% of those conference guests would be men. Let's say there would be 100-200 men staying there at (almost) all times, a store like that - maybe open four or five days a week - could be realistic. And then there's fathers day........
Anyway, these minor inconsistencies, like the city street and the department store, I really don't think Lynch/Frost cared if it fitted with Twin Peaks being a 5120 town or not.
User avatar
indyit
RR Diner Member
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 5:22 am

Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017

Post by indyit »

krishnanspace wrote:Was there any tribute to Miguel ferrer or Warren frost during the Oscars?
Didn't see it but Miguel Ferrer was on the list.

http://www.oscars.org/about/memoriam

Looking at Frost's imdb page it looks like he acted nearly exclusively on TV only. There's a few minor credits for films, but I doubt they would have been enough to justify a mention. His distinguished TV career should prompt a mention at the Emmy's though.
Post Reply