NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread

[AXX°N N.]

I think the desire for a production which never ends points to a wound of some sort in the desiring consumer and I hope, thematically, the new season will confront, contend, and perhaps allow avenue to heal. Death is coming.

[Fashion Suicide]

Would totally be a good thing to finally get to TALK ABOUT JUDY, of course!

But don't expect it, I don't believe Lynch likes to give away every tiny wee little bit.
I think there'll be a "bigger" and "final" explanation to the whole thing (though I can't even give away my hypothesis due to possible spoilers) but WE are most probably the ones who'll have to connect all the dots - and I strongly believe there's gonna be a vast array of very different ways to do that. That's what I love about DKL.

Don't get me wrong, that's what i love about his films too! All i'm saying is that i hope, and believe without having any evidence to back it up, that Judy somehow will be involved in this. Solely because the mystery surrounding her is the one mystery that had me dream and theorize the most all of these years. I always had the feeling that Lynch intended more for Judy than what we saw.. And now, maybe, he has the chance to show us. Either way, when it airs i'm sure i won't really care if she's mentioned since i'm sure it will be fantastic no matter what. I can't wait to be swept in pure Twin Peaks BLISS!!

[underthefan]

I think the desire for a production which never ends points to a wound of some sort in the desiring consumer and I hope, thematically, the new season will confront, contend, and perhaps allow avenue to heal. Death is coming.

Good point there, AXX°N.

[mtsi]

I don't know how much I can trust Sherilyn, at least in giving us 100% truth. It seems to me she's the kind of person to go on a forum and shout "first."

YMMV.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

[Jerry Horne]

New Teaser.

[Jerry Horne]

...

[laughingpinecone]

My ideal scenario is a new miniseries helmed by L+F, new concept new IP new everything. We know that whatever may or may not come afterwards, this endeavour ends "with definitiveness".

I just hope this means this is it for Coop first and foremost, and also for the old cast and their interconnected stories. We've already lost so many. I'm down with any new stories L+F might feel like telling in this 'verse, be it Audrey's Belated Lesbian Hollywood Adventure with a whole new cast or 6 hours of scathing introspection of Michael Cera's character or whatever. I trust them to understand how tough it is to pick a new story that won't cheapen past events and I trust them not to sell out. I think it's always very very difficult, almost impossible, to move past an extremely ambitious chapter that is also meant to be an ending, and I wouldn't risk a blunder. Let endings be endings! But should they fall in love with an idea, I would trust their judgement.

To be frank, I just don't want anyone to have to write around Margaret's absence, or Albert's, or Will's. These wounds are so fresh. Let these actors' legacy live on in the trees.

I think the desire for a production which never ends points to a wound of some sort in the desiring consumer and I hope, thematically, the new season will confront, contend, and perhaps allow avenue to heal. Death is coming.

As often happens, I find your posts to be a voice of reason.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting, but it seems that many people want a definitive ending to Twin Peaks with Season 3. I don't know what everyone's definition of "ending" is, but I fully expect that after I watch the final episodes in September, I will have many questions that will remain unanswered. Maybe not as many as I did after the S2 finale, but certainly Lynch won't wrap it up with a nice bow.

Definitive ending is what both Frost and Nevins said! Lynch keeps insisting on leaving the viewer room to think, so he's certainly not gonna spoon-feed all answers and call it a day. But Mulholland Drive and Inland Empire are great precedents of 'definitive endings' that still leave a lot of questions and thinky thoughts!

[IcedOver]

For me, the main appeal of this new show is that it's Lynch directing the whole deal. Even though "TP" got me into Lynch at ages 13-15 during its original run, I became more a fan of his than the show. I never wanted the show to come back and was very apprehensive when I read the news (and still am). If he weren't directing (which looked possible when he "left"), I'd have zero interest, and wouldn't want any continuation without that same condition. (I'd prefer it not continue and him do a film instead.) As it is, I think we're all sort of expecting it to be a bit more experimental than just a reunion show. I wouldn't mind if it's like "IE" in spots. Hell, with all the musicians on the cast list, it wouldn't be surprising if a whole hour is a concert hour.

[sp.agent.dalecooper]

I think the desire for a production which never ends points to a wound of some sort in the desiring consumer and I hope, thematically, the new season will confront, contend, and perhaps allow avenue to heal. Death is coming.

While I wouldn't disgree with your assessment in a vacuum, in the contect of these past few pages, where has there been a rallying cry for a Twin Peaks that never ends and goes on and on and on?

I personally am more than fine and content with the gift we are about to be given, but I've only seen a few people express that they would have no complaints about a 4th season or perhaps 5, provided it was what the creators desired themselves.

How does that line up with "a production that never ends"?

[Panapaok]

Holy shit! IT IS HAPPENING AGAIN

[krishnanspace]

NOW THATS HOW YOU TEASE PEOPLE!!!!!!

[sp.agent.dalecooper]

OH WOW.

This new teaser and new images delight to no end! Even if a certain dread and sadness seems to emanate from each face(perhaps just part of the journey)

[Bloodflood]

That scene with Sarah is sending shivers down my spine.

[Bloodflood]

It also looks so beautiful. Aaargh! I'm so hyped!

[Audrey Horne]

Amazing. The show is going to be great. Sarah!