NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
There's no way that Twin Peaks will have a Super Bowl teaser. Period. These things cost 5 million dollars or something. I think they'll release the next one with the S2 marathon in about two weeks.
This is - excuse me - a damn fine cup of coffee.
- laughingpinecone
- Great Northern Member
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:45 am
- Location: D'ni
- Contact:
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Again, the only reason I can fathom for a TP appearance at the Super Bowl is Superb Owl jokes, and I doubt those are high on Showtime's priorities
] The gathered are known by their faces of stone.
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I still say Tim Roth but this is a sheer gut feeling.Panapaok wrote:Still wondering who replaced Peter Sarsgaard. Looking at the cast list, there's a bunch of people of similar looks and same age range.
My totally silly theory from way back was that they originally didn't think they could get Bowie, so they cast Sarsgaard as Jeffries, then Bowie said he could do it, then he died and they asked Sarsgaard again, he had already booked another job, so they went to Tim Roth.
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I've wondered if that's why Naomi Watts' did that recent horror release that was total rubbish and even had "total rubbish" written all over it. Was it a way to supplement the less-than-ideal income that comes along with a TP job? A lot of this is simply about working with David Lynch-- he doesn't get much in the way of financial backing for his projects. I can't remember details, but I know nobody in the Blue Velvet cast made a lot of money. I think Dennis Hopper and Laura Dern worked for peanuts, but they both needed those roles at that point in their respective careers. For very different reasons of course.Aerozhul wrote:You take another job that pays more money, but perhaps is a lesser role and gets you more eyeballs but less cred. See: LFB doing Wayne's World instead of FWWM. On the surface it seems ludicrous that she did that instead, but she probably made more money for that silly role, and it likely did more for her career. Though in retrospect, she'd probably be held in higher regard today for the meatier role in FWWM.bob_wooler wrote:How do you get more money for bills if you turn down a job?Major Briggs wrote:I don't really think it's fair to judge an actor for not taking a job based on money. Yeah it's a privilege work with a creator like Lynch but, you know, sometimes bills gotta be paid, kids gotta be fed, etc
Last edited by Dead Dog on Sun Feb 05, 2017 6:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
- krishnanspace
- Bookhouse Member
- Posts: 1174
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:15 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I didnt mean that they would release a Tv spot during Super Bowl.I meant that a lot of movies and Tv series(Stranger Things) are releasing their trailers tomorrow.It would be good if they released theirs tomorrow on YouTubePanapaok wrote:There's no way that Twin Peaks will have a Super Bowl teaser. Period. These things cost 5 million dollars or something. I think they'll release the next one with the S2 marathon in about two weeks.
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Yeah, S2 marathon seems to be the likeliest time for a new teaser. Don't know why they'd release one today.
The cow jumped over the moon.
- laughingpinecone
- Great Northern Member
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:45 am
- Location: D'ni
- Contact:
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Because they love us...? /bats eyelashes in Showtime's general directionPöllö wrote:Yeah, S2 marathon seems to be the likeliest time for a new teaser. Don't know why they'd release one today.
] The gathered are known by their faces of stone.
- bob_wooler
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 2:00 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
You can choose another job if there's another job offered for you. Though I'm sure this is what happened in LFB's case in `92 I don't believe for a second this is what happened with MJA (he hasn't had a proper acting job in seven years).Aerozhul wrote:You take another job that pays more money, but perhaps is a lesser role and gets you more eyeballs but less cred. See: LFB doing Wayne's World instead of FWWM. On the surface it seems ludicrous that she did that instead, but she probably made more money for that silly role, and it likely did more for her career. Though in retrospect, she'd probably be held in higher regard today for the meatier role in FWWM.bob_wooler wrote:How do you get more money for bills if you turn down a job?Major Briggs wrote:I don't really think it's fair to judge an actor for not taking a job based on money. Yeah it's a privilege work with a creator like Lynch but, you know, sometimes bills gotta be paid, kids gotta be fed, etc
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Yeah but they're releasing those teasers during the commercials on Super Bowl. That's the point.krishnanspace wrote:I didnt mean that they would release a Tv spot during Super Bowl.I meant that a lot of movies and Tv series(Stranger Things) are releasing their trailers tomorrow.It would be good if they released theirs tomorrow on YouTubePanapaok wrote:There's no way that Twin Peaks will have a Super Bowl teaser. Period. These things cost 5 million dollars or something. I think they'll release the next one with the S2 marathon in about two weeks.
This is - excuse me - a damn fine cup of coffee.
- krishnanspace
- Bookhouse Member
- Posts: 1174
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:15 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
They just posted a teaser on the YouTube channel now
- Rainwater
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 3:00 am
- Location: Under the Sycamore trees
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Yeah.. for the old series.
I'll see you in the trees
- krishnanspace
- Bookhouse Member
- Posts: 1174
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:15 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
So my guess was right.I knew they would post a new Video on YouTube today
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Isn't it basically lifted directly from the Blu-Ray set?
- sneakydave
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 9:02 am
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I just got a thumbs up from Showtime on Twitter when I suggested a teaser could be coming tonight because of the Superb Owl .
An awful joke. But I'm holding onto it to hope we'll get something new later.
An awful joke. But I'm holding onto it to hope we'll get something new later.
*M*A*Y*D*A*Y*
- laughingpinecone
- Great Northern Member
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:45 am
- Location: D'ni
- Contact:
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
laughingpinecone wrote:Again, the only reason I can fathom for a TP appearance at the Super Bowl is Superb Owl jokes, and I doubt those are high on Showtime's priorities
sneakydave wrote:I just got a thumbs up from Showtime on Twitter when I suggested a teaser could be coming tonight because of the Superb Owl .
] The gathered are known by their faces of stone.